Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Clinics ; 67(12): 1427-1431, Dec. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-660471

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Enterobacteriaceae bacteria harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase are a serious worldwide threat. The molecular identification of these pathogens is not routine in Brazilian hospitals, and a rapid phenotypic screening test is desirable. This study aims to evaluate the modified Hodge test as a phenotypic screening test for Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. METHOD: From April 2009 to July 2011, all Enterobacteriaceae bacteria that were not susceptible to ertapenem according to Vitek2 analysis were analyzed with the modified Hodge test. All positive isolates and a random subset of negative isolates were also assayed for the presence of blaKPC. Isolates that were positive in modified Hodge tests were sub-classified as true-positives (E. coli touched the ertapenem disk) or inconclusive (distortion of the inhibition zone of E. coli, but growth did not reach the ertapenem disk). Negative results were defined as samples with no distortion of the inhibition zone around the ertapenem disk. RESULTS: Among the 1521 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae bacteria that were not susceptible to ertapenem, 30% were positive for blaKPC, and 35% were positive according to the modified Hodge test (81% specificity). Under the proposed sub-classification, true positives showed a 98% agreement with the blaKPC results. The negative predictive value of the modified Hodge test for detection was 100%. KPC producers showed high antimicrobial resistance rates, but 90% and 77% of these isolates were susceptible to aminoglycoside and tigecycline, respectively. CONCLUSION: Standardizing the modified Hodge test interpretation may improve the specificity of KPC detection. In this study, negative test results ruled out 100% of the isolates harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase 2. The test may therefore be regarded as a good epidemiological tool.


Subject(s)
Humans , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Klebsiella pneumoniae/isolation & purification , beta-Lactamases/genetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , DNA, Bacterial/analysis , Klebsiella pneumoniae/drug effects , Klebsiella pneumoniae/enzymology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , beta-Lactam Resistance/drug effects , beta-Lactam Resistance/genetics , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
2.
J. bras. pneumol ; 38(1): 66-71, jan.-fev. 2012. ilus, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-617030

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Determinar a concentração inibitória mínima (CIM) de penicilina parenteral e moxifloxacina contra cepas de Streptococcus pneumoniae isoladas em um centro hospitalar. Métodos: Estudo in vitro prospectivo de 100 isolados de S. pneumoniae coletados de pacientes tratados entre outubro de 2008 e julho de 2010 no complexo do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, em São Paulo (SP). Os isolados foram obtidos de culturas do trato respiratório e de amostras de sangue não relacionadas a infecções meníngeas e foram testados quanto à suscetibilidade a penicilina e moxifloxacina por E test. As interpretações categóricas de CIM foram baseadas em padrões atualizados. RESULTADOS: Todos os isolados foram suscetíveis a penicilina parenteral (CIM < 2 µg/mL) e, consequentemente, eram também suscetíveis a amoxicilina, ampicilina, cefalosporinas de terceira e quarta geração e ertapenem. Quanto à moxifloxacina, 99 por cento das cepas de S. pneumoniae também foram suscetíveis, e somente uma teve CIM = 1,5 µg/mL (intermediário). Conclusões: Nossos resultados mostraram altas taxas de sensibilidade a penicilina parenteral e moxifloxacin nos isolados de S. pneumoniae não relacionados a meningite, o que difere de relatos internacionais. Relatos sobre resistência a penicilina devem ser baseados em pontos de corte atualizados para isolados não relacionados a meningite a fim de guiar a escolha terapêutica antimicrobiana e melhorar a predição dos desfechos clínicos.


OBJECTIVE: To determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of parenteral penicillin and moxifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated at a hospital center. METHODS: In-vitro, prospective study involving 100 S. pneumoniae isolates collected from patients who had been treated, between October of 2008 and July of 2010, at the Hospital das Clínicas complex of the University of São Paulo School of Medicine, located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. The isolates were obtained from respiratory tract cultures or blood samples unrelated to meningeal infections, and they were tested for penicillin and moxifloxacin susceptibility by E-test. The MIC category interpretations were based on updated standards. RESULTS: All isolates were fully susceptible to parenteral penicillin (MIC < 2 µg/mL), and, consequently, they were also susceptible to amoxicillin, ampicillin, third/fourth generation cephalosporins, and ertapenem. Of the S. pneumoniae strains, 99 percent were also susceptible to moxifloxacin, and only one strain showed an MIC = 1.5 µg/mL (intermediate). CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed high susceptibility rates to parenteral penicillin and moxifloxacin among S. pneumoniae isolates unrelated to meningitis, which differs from international reports. Reports on penicillin resistance should be based on updated breakpoints for non-meningitis isolates in order to guide the selection of an antimicrobial therapy and to improve the prediction of the clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Aza Compounds/pharmacology , Penicillin Resistance/drug effects , Penicillins/pharmacology , Quinolines/pharmacology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Streptococcus pneumoniae/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Prospective Studies , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification
3.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 10(3): 203-216, June 2006. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-435288

ABSTRACT

The increasing antimicrobial resistance found in the many clinically important species of bacteria that commonly cause serious and life-threatening diseases presents a difficult challenge for clinicians, especially when an appropriate initial therapy must be chosen. New antibiotics are urgently needed to address the formidable issues associated with infections caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The need for new antibiotics that effectively resist antimicrobial mechanisms of resistance has become paramount. Tigecycline is a new antimicrobial agent; it is the first in a new class of antibiotics, the glycylcyclines, with properties conferring the ability to overcome many common resistance mechanisms, thus allowing the use of tigecycline for many serious and life-threatening infections for which the use of other antibiotics is no longer appropriate. Tigecycline is a novel expanded spectrum antibiotic that appears poised to meet the latest bacterial challenges facing clinicians, including the serious and life-threatening infections caused by highly resistant bacteria. Tigecycline, moreover, appears to hold promise as a new, versatile antibiotic that can be chosen for empirical therapy, even as a single agent, for initial therapy of many clinically important infections.


Subject(s)
Animals , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Minocycline/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Minocycline/chemistry , Minocycline/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL